On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 09:58 -0700, Takesi satoh wrote: > I wonder that I can use RBAC in RHEL5 or not. > Here is my problem. > > I created new user, and new roles. Let me say john_u: john_r:john_t. > After I made loadable module, loaded it, and I added some entry to > default_context and default_type, > john_u:john_r:john_t was assigned to linux user "john" when john > logined from GNOME. > > Next, since I wanted to try the case of "john logins from console", > I added new entry "system_r:local_login_t john_r:john_t > system_r:unconfined_t" to default_context > and jonh logins from console(tty), then system_r:unconfined_t was > assigned to john. > > I thought the reason why it happened was the below policy > "type_transition local_login_t shell_exec_t:process transition", > so I downloaded RHEL's selinux-policy-targeted.src.rpm, replaced from > above type_transition sentence to "allow local_login_t > userdomain:process transition;" in local_login.te, and rebuilded rpm. > > Then, john logined from console again, and john was assigned to > "local_login_t" > Any domain transition did not happen here. > I wondered " What if I use strict policy? ", so I tried strict policy. > But the result is same, john was assined to local_login_t. How did you create your user role? Did you just declare the types and roles, or did you use the policy templates? -- Chris PeBenito Tresys Technology, LLC (410) 290-1411 x150 -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
