Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote: > What's up with *that*? The *fastest* run with it disabled is 1.118, and > the *slowest* with it enabled is 1.119. At that point, I have to wonder > what we're really measuring here.... That's a good point. I missed that, probably because I *knew* it would be slower with SELinux enabled, and so just assumed that it was. That's really odd. There should be no disk accesses happening (the pagecache/buffer cache is preloaded and noatime is turned on), the CPUs are running at top speed at all times, and there's lots of free RAM available. Network activity should also be minimal, so I'm not sure why there's so much variance. I'll re-run my tests from a kernel running a single bash and nothing else, see if I can get more consistent data. David -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
