Sorry to get you confused, (I feel like a blind man that cant read
braille) with fglrx inside the scripting there is a call for
KCL_PosixSecurityCapGetEffectiveVector:(below)
KCL_TYPE_Cap ATI_API_CALL KCL_PosixSecurityCapGetEffectiveVector()
{
return cap_t(current->cap_effective);
}
void ATI_API_CALL KCL_PosixSecurityCapSetEffectiveVector(KCL_TYPE_Cap cap)
{
cap_t(current->cap_effective) = cap;
}
Like what you said about the bit being changed this is probably what
I'm looking at (cap_t is no longer in there)
There error is this:(below)
/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/firegl_public.c: In function
'KCL_PosixSecurityCapGetEffectiveVector':
/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/firegl_public.c:1888: error:
implicit declaration of function 'cap_t'
/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/firegl_public.c: In function
'KCL_PosixSecurityCapSetEffectiveVector':
/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/firegl_public.c:1896: error:
invalid lvalue in assignment
How hard is it to go in and change the old capability requests to fit
the new capability.h ?
--
Justin P. Mattock
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
