On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 15:45 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 March 2008 1:54:48 pm David P. Quigley wrote:
> > This patch introduces two new hooks. One to get all relevant
> > information from an LSM about an inode an the second given that
> > context to set it on the inode. The setcontext call takes a flag to
> > indicate if it should set the incore representation, the ondisk
> > representation or both. This hook is for use in the labeled NFS code
> > and addresses concerns of how to set security on an inode in a
> > multi-xattr LSM.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David P. Quigley <dpquigl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/linux/security.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > security/dummy.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > security/security.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > security/selinux/hooks.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 4 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
> > index fe52cde..bb71ac9 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/security.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/security.h
> > @@ -112,6 +112,10 @@ struct request_sock;
> > #define LSM_UNSAFE_PTRACE 2
> > #define LSM_UNSAFE_PTRACE_CAP 4
> >
> > +/* Flags for setsecctx */
> > +#define LSM_SETCORE 1
> > +#define LSM_SETDISK 2
> > +
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -1395,6 +1399,9 @@ struct security_operations {
> > int (*secctx_to_secid)(char *secdata, u32 seclen, u32 *secid);
> > void (*release_secctx)(char *secdata, u32 seclen);
> >
> > + int (*inode_setsecctx)(struct dentry *dentry, void *ctx, u32
> > ctxlen, int flags);
> > + int (*inode_getsecctx)(struct dentry *dentry,
> > void **ctx, u32 *ctxlen);
>
> Not a terribly big deal, but I liked James' suggestion of 'file_<blah>'
> instead of 'inode_<blah>'.
I wasn't as keen on it - at present, we use file_ for hooks that operate
on an open file (struct file).
And it is already the case that e.g. inode_getsecurity and
inode_setsecurity can and are used on socket inodes via f[gs]etxattr to
get the socket inode's security label.
For actually getting the sk security label (which ideally would always
be kept in sync, but that isn't addressed today), we might have a
sk_[gs]etsecctx.
--
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
