Re: refpolicy: patch for ldconfig from glibc 2.7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Václav Ovsík wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 01:05:39PM -0500, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
>> This is the right fix, and basically the same fix is queued up for
>> merging as part of Dan's patch set.
> 
> Ok. Should I stop to send patches based on the Dan's Fedora policy?
No if more people report it, it gives a better indication that the
Fedora policy is correct.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkfC0wEACgkQrlYvE4MpobPqvwCfTSDwtfvtgxx22/efWEkoHNl3
0AoAoKNOvowl7D40y0p+3kqlahWuWe9/
=VhCD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux