On Friday 01 February 2008 10:05:27 am Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 10:01 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/Policy/ > > > > Patch is now up to 28000 lines. > > > > {snip} > > > > Going forward this is going to get more difficult. I think we need > > more people with the ability to update the reference policy. Even > > if they just cherry pick through the differences in my patches and > > upstream. I don't believe one person can keep up with the volume > > of changes. > > Maybe create a fedora branch of refpolicy? Does this actually solve the problem, or just move the patch problem from outside refpolicy SVN into a branch within refpolicy? The changes still need to get merged into the trunk and I'm not sure a branch helps that any (maybe it does, I guess it all depends on how Chris works). -- paul moore linux security @ hp -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
