On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 05:19 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > plain text document attachment (diff) > diff --exclude-from=exclude -N -u -r nsalibselinux/src/Makefile libselinux-2.0.46/src/Makefile > --- nsalibselinux/src/Makefile 2007-09-26 19:37:45.000000000 -0400 > +++ libselinux-2.0.46/src/Makefile 2008-01-05 08:19:27.000000000 -0500 > @@ -77,14 +77,14 @@ > > install: all > test -d $(LIBDIR) || install -m 755 -d $(LIBDIR) > - install -m 644 $(LIBA) $(LIBDIR) Why remove the static library from the install target? We still want it installable via some target. > test -d $(SHLIBDIR) || install -m 755 -d $(SHLIBDIR) > install -m 755 $(LIBSO) $(SHLIBDIR) > cd $(LIBDIR) && ln -sf ../../`basename $(SHLIBDIR)`/$(LIBSO) $(TARGET) > > install-pywrap: pywrap > test -d $(PYTHONLIBDIR)/site-packages || install -m 755 -d $(PYTHONLIBDIR)/site-packages > - install -m 755 $(SWIGFILES) $(PYTHONLIBDIR)/site-packages > + install -m 755 $(SWIGSO) $(PYTHONLIBDIR)/site-packages > + install -m 644 selinux.py $(PYTHONLIBDIR)/site-packages So is there much point in keeping SWIGFILES around then? Also used in clean: at present, but that's the only remaining use. And presumably the same change should happen to libsemanage? > relabel: > /sbin/restorecon $(SHLIBDIR)/$(LIBSO) -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
