Okay. I can:
(1) Have cachefilesd (the daemon) pass a security context string to the
cachefiles kernel module, which can then convert it to a secID. It'll
require a security_secctx_to_secid() function, but I'm fairly certain I
have a patch to add such kicking around somewhere.
(2) Make security_task_kernel_act_as() take a task_security struct and a
secID and just assign the latter to the former. I'm not sure it makes
sense to do any checks here, other than checking that under SELinux the
secID is of SECCLASS_PROCESS class.
However, I need to write a check that the cachefilesd daemon is permitted to
nominate the secID it did. Can someone tell me how to do this? The obvious
way to do this is to add another PROCESS__xxx security permit specifically for
cachefiles, but that seems like a waste of a bit when there are only two spare
bits.
avc_has_perm(daemon_tsec->sid, nominated_sid,
SECCLASS_PROCESS, PROCESS__CACHEFILES_USE, NULL);
Now, I recall the addition of another security class being mentioned, which
presumably would give something like:
avc_has_perm(daemon_tsec->sid, nominated_sid,
SECCLASS_CACHE, CACHE__USE_AS_OVERRIDE, NULL);
And I assume this doesn't care if one, the other or both of the two SIDs
mentioned are of SECCLASS_PROCESS rather than of SECCLASS_CACHE.
David
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
