Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > No. I mean call the bit PG_private2. That way non-pagecache and > > > filesystems that don't use fscache can use it. > > > > The bit is called PG_owner_priv_2, and then 'subclassed' to PG_fscache, > > much like PG_owner_priv_1 is 'subclassed' to PG_checked as was recommended. > > It is not owner_priv if you're putting checks and tests into core > kernel pagecache code for it. owner_priv means a filesystem has it > _all_ to itself. Okay, I'll change it if it makes you happy. Bear in mind, though, you're dictating instructions that conflict with those other people have dictated. David -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
