On Tuesday 11 December 2007 12:21:26 pm David Miller wrote: > From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@xxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:15:00 -0500 > > > I still would like to see the rest of the changes make it into > > 2.6.25 (the SPI byte order thing is particularly troublesome) so if > > you don't mind a "v3" I'll respin this patch right now to remove the > > "sid -> secid" bits. > > Technically this could break anything parsing the audit logs, but no > matter, I'd rather fix this now while we still can. True, this does change how userspace sees things but I think that any userspace code that currently uses this SPI value successfully is either lucky or has a workaround/hack in place. > I would classify the spi endianness bit as a bug fix, could you please > just split out that fix for net-2.6, then we can make a second patch > after I rebase net-2.6.25 which can do the rest of your patch sans the > linux/xfrm.h change? Sure. Although that's enough of a change that I'd want to retest the patch a bit first. If I can't get it done today expect something in your inbox tomorrow. Thanks for your patience. -- paul moore linux security @ hp -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
