On Friday 07 December 2007 3:36:08 pm Eric Paris wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 12:11 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> > This patch fixes a number of small but potentially troublesome things in
> > the XFRM/IPsec code:
> >
> > * Use the 'audit_enabled' variable already in include/linux/audit.h
> > Removed the need for extern declarations local to each XFRM audit
> > fuction
{snip}
> although it does make me wonder why audit_log_start doesn't just check
> audit_enabled itself....
/me shrugs ... I have no idea, I've just always followed the lead of what was
already written, but now that you mention it - it doesn't make much sense. I
suppose at some point we can go through and change all the 'audit_enabled'
users, but I wonder if there is some point (?performance?) to having the
callers check?
--
paul moore
linux security @ hp
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
