--- David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > inode_getsecurity and getprocattr directly return the strings. > > Admittedly, the whole interface could be cleaned up and made far more > > consistent, but I don't think he necessarily has to go through the > > getsecid + secid_to_secctx sequence if he only wants the secctx. > > It's what Daniel Walsh wanted. Name dropper. And we don't have a convention, really. So go ahead with key_getsecurity or key_getsecctx, as you choose. At some point we should either change inode_getsecurity to inode_getsecctx or secid_to_secctx to secid_to_security. Not the problem of the day. Casey Schaufler casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.