On Monday 03 December 2007 2:41:07 pm Todd C. Miller wrote: > > Stephen Smalley wrote: > > Looks like the libsepol patch puts the policycaps ebitmap at a different > > location in the policy image than the kernel patch expects. > > I had initially changed the ebitmap reading/writing location from > where Josh had it to work around an issue with semodule. This version > preserves the location in the final policy binary without confusing > sepol_module_package_info(). Okay, well that at least loaded my simple test policy but it didn't appear to have any effect on /selinux/policy_capabilities/network_peer_controls. This may be a problem with the kernel patch but before I started digging around I thought I would first check with you on the correct policy syntax. I'm using a Rawhide targeted policy and I'm loading a simple policy module with the following statements: policy_module(peer_test,0.0.1) policycap network_peer_controls; type peer_test_t; It compiles (using /usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile) and loads (semodule -i peer_test.pp) but I'm not certain I haven't messed something up. Thoughts? -- paul moore linux security @ hp -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
