Re: unreserved_port_t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> How are we supposed to write policy for programs that bind to random unused 
> ports >1024?  There doesn't seem to be any macro that allows binging to 
> unreserved_port_t except corenet_tcp_bind_all_unreserved_ports() which is too 
> permissive.

Seems like corenet_tcp_bind_unreserved_ports() is currently missing. Please
add. There is a corenet_tcp_bind_reserved_ports().


-- 
gpg --locate-keys dominick.grift@xxxxxxxxxxx
Key fingerprint = FCD2 3660 5D6B 9D27 7FC6  E0FF DA7E 521F 10F6 4098
https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xDA7E521F10F64098
Dominick Grift



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux