Dominick Grift <dominick.grift@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On Thursday, 21 January 2021 12:28:49 AM AEDT Dominick Grift wrote: >>> > optional_policy(` >>> > + init_dbus_chat(sysadm_t) >>> >>> Can you explain why you added this? >> >> Apart from the obvious that some program wanted it, no. I'll remove that bit >> and add it again with a note if it's necessary. Did you like the rest of that >> patch? > > Yes and thats my beef with this. "some program wanted it". sysadm_t is a > shell domain. Any programs that need this should, in my view, ideally be > targeted. If you dont want that then use unconfined_t instead and be > done. > > I dont want sysadm_t to become a "drunken unconfined_t". But also if this was added to support resolving dynamic users with systemd then this is no longer needed because resolving of dynamic users with systemd is no longer done with dbus. It is using varlink for that now. -- gpg --locate-keys dominick.grift@xxxxxxxxxxx Key fingerprint = FCD2 3660 5D6B 9D27 7FC6 E0FF DA7E 521F 10F6 4098 https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xDA7E521F10F64098 Dominick Grift
