On 12/9/20 9:37 AM, Richard Haines wrote: > On Wed, 2020-12-09 at 19:42 +0530, Ashish Mishra wrote: >> Hi Richard , >> >> Will check with the monolithic policy to check the behavior of the >> semodule as you suggested. >> >> Is there any similar approach / workaround for modular one? > > I've only had a quick look at code and I could see two ways to fix: > 1) Modify the Rules.modular part of the make file to move or copy the > policy and file contexts set of files over to $DESTDIR. > 2) Modify semodule/semanage to handle $DESTDIR. I think this would be > more difficult to fix as lots go on here. > semodule does accept the -p option to change the root, so we could feed DESTDIR into that. For example, a minimally tested patch: diff --git a/Rules.modular b/Rules.modular index d6224e95..64d953dc 100644 --- a/Rules.modular +++ b/Rules.modular @@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ load: $(instpkg) $(appfiles) # make sure two directories exist since they are not # created by semanage @echo "Loading configured modules." - @$(INSTALL) -d -m 0755 $(policypath) $(dir $(fcpath)) - $(verbose) $(SEMODULE) -s $(NAME) -i $(modpkgdir)/$(notdir $(base_pkg)) $(foreach mod,$(mod_pkgs),-i $(modpkgdir)/$(mod)) + @$(INSTALL) -d -m 0755 $(policypath) $(dir $(fcpath)) $(DESTDIR)/var/lib/selinux + $(verbose) $(SEMODULE) -p $(DESTDIR)/ -s $(NAME) -i $(modpkgdir)/$(notdir $(base_pkg)) $(foreach mod,$(mod_pkgs),-i $(modpkgdir)/$(mod)) ######################################## # Note that we need to create $(DESTDIR)/var/lib/selinux since semanage expects that to already exist. Though, I would suggest that maybe the "install" target should run the above semodule command with the --noreload option to install all files and build the policy binary but not actually load it into the kernel. Then make load just becomes something like semodule -p $(DESTDIR)/ --reload Makes a clear distinction between installing everything that's needed vs actually loading the policy into the kernel. Happy to create a patch if that approach makes sense.