Re: systemd_generator_t vs systemd_generator_type

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/10/20 11:02 PM, Russell Coker wrote:
This combination of names is confusing.  As a general rule I think we
shouldn't have a type name be a substring of an attribute name.  Having an
attribute name as a substring of a type name is less of an issue but still
best avoided.

/lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-bless-boot-generator
/lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-cryptsetup-generator
/lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-debug-generator
/lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-getty-generator
/lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-hibernate-resume-generator
/lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-rc-local-generator
/lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-run-generator
/lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-system-update-generator
/lib/systemd/system-generators/systemd-veritysetup-generator
/usr/lib/systemd/user-environment-generators/30-systemd-environment-d-
generator

Above are the generators on my system that run as systemd_generator_t.  Would
systemd_generator_generic_t/systemd_generator_generic_exec_t be an OK name?

I'd accept a patch for this.

--
Chris PeBenito



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux