On Sunday, 13 January 2019 6:46:44 AM AEDT Chris PeBenito wrote: > The chromium policy Jason posted is indeed slimmer than the current > mozilla policy (see Jason's thread), which would seem to indicate > keeping them separate. However, the mozilla policy is so big because > it's been around for a long time and has built up all of the various > odds and ends that a browser brings in, which could possibly be missing > from the chromium policy. > > I am on the fence. I could see going either way. One of the things the Mozilla policy has is a domain for plugins while Chrome has a domain for a sandbox. Does Chrome support running plugins in a separate process (doesn't seem to but I generally avoid plugins). There seems to be some real functionality difference between the two browsers. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/
