Re: Self-signed SSL cert vs. CA on same server

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



sherwin Lu said:
>   The only reason to put the CA on another machine is
> security.  Of couse, the only reason to use a CA is
> security.
>   If possible, I would suggest you leave the CA off
> the network when not in use.  Even better is to
> transfer the CSR and certificates back and forth on
> floppy and not even put the CA on a network.
>   In the Enterprise, the root CA is stored on
> persistent storage inside a safe(physically locked
> away) and a 1st level CA deligated by the root level
> CA actually signs certificates.  This makes recovery
> simpler if the 1st level CA get compromised.  Don't
> bother with this if you're not going to sign many
> certificates.

Oh OK that makes great sense.  Thanks for the information!

=====
/dev/idal
"GNU/Linux is free freedom" --Me

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
     To unsubscribe email security-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
         with "unsubscribe" in the subject of the message.


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Linux Crypto]     [Kernel]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [USB]     [Fedora Security]

  Powered by Linux