RE: Re: Ques. Regarding s390 kernel Compilatio n..

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Funny, the word I get is that Marcelo is notoriously poor at accepting the
patches IBM tries to send him.  Apparently most of the patches they were
able to get accepted they sent via Alan Cox, who was willing to integrate
them.  Hopefully things will get a lot better with the 2.6 kernels.

Yes, you will need lots, and lots of patches to put on your kernel, and IBM
has not released any for 2.4.24.  They're still at 2.4.21, with
"experimental" patches for 2.4.23.  Go to
http://www10.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux390/june2003_re
commended.shtml for more information.

If you're going to be working with Linux for S/390 and zSeries, you should
probably subscribe to the Linux-390 mailing list that is hosted by Marist
College.  Go to http://www2.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?linux-390, scroll down
most of the way, and use the web form to subscribe.  You may also want to
check out http://linuxvm.org/.  It provides a lot of information and
pointers to information about Linux/390.


Mark Post

-----Original Message-----
From: Pete Zaitcev [mailto:zaitcev@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 3:16 PM
To: Anoop Chandran
Cc: redhat-s390-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject:  Re: Ques. Regarding s390 kernel
Compilation..


On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 01:15:27 -0800 (PST)
Anoop Chandran <anoop_chandran_79@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I am in the process of upgrading the default RH 7.2
> kernel avaialable for s390.
> I've downloaded the latest 2.4.24 kernel, which i need
> to compile and install.
> 
> while looking for any pointers in this regard,I came
> across ur post in RH-s390.

I'm cc-ing this back to the list as you should've done.
And try to spel "your" correctly, too.

> However, the post describes only the compilation
> instructions. 
> 
> I would like to know how to install this newly
> compiled kernel and start my linux image to use the
> same.

It's only a little different from a regular Linux kernel installation.
Key differences are:
 1. Image in arch/s390/boot/image is used (uncompressed)
 2. /etc/zipl.conf is used instead of /etc/lilo.conf

A useful trick when playing with kernels on s390 is to use
several DASDs to boot several zipl.conf-s, using zipl -c foo.conf.
This allows experimenting under z/VM without ever booting CMS,
and FTP-ing into CMS is a royal pain. This is very important,
because your first kernel is likely to be broken in some regard.
If you overwrite the one and only /etc/zipl.conf, you're screwed.

> Also, is it required that any patch (from ibm/redhat)
> be applied to the kernel source before compiling it on
> s390 system ?

Possibly. Depends if you run an application which requires
some extension. I would just try running it as-is, it should
be good enough. I do not remember if 2.4.9-38 includes anything
that was generally useful or necessary (for a mainframe).

IBM post updates to DeveloperWorks website and they are notoriously
poor at feeding them to Marcelo. You might want to check those,
but I think they mostly concern with new hardware support, such
as zfcp.

-- Pete
_______________________________________________
Redhat-s390-list mailing list
Redhat-s390-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-s390-list
_______________________________________________
Redhat-s390-list mailing list
Redhat-s390-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-s390-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [LKML]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Linux s390]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux