On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 1:05 AM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > I remember Daniel Wagner has been asking to include PREEMPT_RT within > kernelci. I don't really know what the status here is. Thank you for the > work. > > Since PREEMPT_RT is now available upstream, would it work to compile and > enable some of its tests for the supported architectures on Linus' tree > and maybe the -next tree? I don't think that happens at the moment, I > saw only a few stable-rt trees. > > If so, should I just open an issue at > https://github.com/kernelci/kernelci-core/issues/new > > Is there be anything in particular you need help with? > Unrelated to KernelCI - how stable is PREEMPT_RT in practice ? Reason for asking is that I enabled it for x86_64 together with lock debugging and got an almost immediate "sleeping function called" backtrace. Thanks, Guenter
