On 2023-05-24 23:14:17 [-0300], Luis Claudio R. Goncalves wrote: > > My question is whether I should use the workaround or something like > > what Clark did in v5.15-rt: > > > > 449f5e1c4ddef Revert "printk: remove deferred printing" > > > > Which brings back all of deferred printing. I do hope, for my sanity, that > > the answer is "workaround", but whatever you suggest is good for me :) > > The original patch failed on aarch64. So I expanded the patch a bit and > changed description, making it an extension of the deferred printing > removal already in tree. The question remains the same. :) I missed that this got reverted in the v5.15 tree. Please see what I wrote to your release email. And this deferred thingy needs to go back into v5.15. Sebastian
