Hello!
I humbly defer to you, fellow maintainers, with an interesting question:
While merging v5.10.119 on top of v5.10-rt the new 'random' code reverted
most of
c19a1b9dff1a random: Make it work on rt
And the remaining bits did not make too much sense in the context, so I
removed the few remaining chunks as part of the merge process.
My question is:
- As the code for 'random' now matches upstream, should I add a note to the
merge commit stating that the commit above was reverted in the merge?
Should I have added an extra commit to revert the remaining bits instead
of doing that in the merge? Should I have first reverted the commit above
and then performed the merge? Or is it OK and I am wasting time?
It is worth to note that the code with commit c19a1b9dff1a reverted
survived my usual LTP and stress-ng tests without a scratch.
Best regards,
Luis
