On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 6:02 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 21:56:28 +0100 > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 2021-12-07 15:20:49 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 21:17:12 +0100 > > > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > On 2021-12-02 19:05:53 [-0300], Luis Claudio R. Goncalves wrote: > > > > > I'm pleased to announce the 5.10.83-rt58 stable release. > > > > … > > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/patch-5.10.83-rt58.patch.xz > > > > > > > > Any particular reason why every patch has "v4.9-rt" in the Subject line? > > > > > > I'm guessing because he just took over 5.10-rt and did not update his > > > scripts ;-) > > > > It seems to confuse ppl. Is there a reason to have it? > > > > It shouldn't. The point I'm making is that this is Luis's first release of > 5.10-rt, and it sounds like it had some issues. > > Luis, you may want to see what happened and fix it. Yes, I am really sorry that escaped my review. I focused on testing the code and missed something that obvious. Sorry for the confusion I caused. Steven, Sebastian, would it be worth a v5.10.83-rt59 with the patch subjects fixed? Thanks for spotting that, Luis > > Thanks, > > -- Steve >
