Re: [PATCH RT 1/5] net: Properly annotate the try-lock for the seqlock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2020-11-14 at 13:24 -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-11-14 at 20:00 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > __raw_write_seqcount_end() is an integral part of write_sequnlock(),
> > but we do seem to be missing a seqcount_release() in 5.4-rt.
> >
>
> Yep, you're right, it's just the missing seqcount_release() - I'll
> resubmit with just that.

Or just drop the backport, since it adds annotation, while the original
was fixing existing annotation.

__raw_write_seqcount_begin() called in 5.4-rt try_write_seqlock() is
not annotated, while write_seqcount_begin() called by the 5.9-rt
version leads to the broken annotation that the original then fixed.

	-Mike





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux