[PATCH RT 07/24] seqlock: provide the same ordering semantics as mainline

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



4.14.63-rt41-rc2 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Julia Cartwright <julia@xxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit afa4c06b89a3c0fb7784ff900ccd707bef519cb7 ]

The mainline implementation of read_seqbegin() orders prior loads w.r.t.
the read-side critical section.  Fixup the RT writer-boosting
implementation to provide the same guarantee.

Also, while we're here, update the usage of ACCESS_ONCE() to use
READ_ONCE().

Fixes: e69f15cf77c23 ("seqlock: Prevent rt starvation")
Cc: stable-rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Julia Cartwright <julia@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/seqlock.h | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
index a59751276b94..107079a2d7ed 100644
--- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
@@ -462,6 +462,7 @@ static inline unsigned read_seqbegin(seqlock_t *sl)
 		spin_unlock_wait(&sl->lock);
 		goto repeat;
 	}
+	smp_rmb();
 	return ret;
 }
 #endif
-- 
2.18.0





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux