3.10.84-rt92-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Running a test on a large CPU count box with xfs, I hit a live lock
with the following backtraces on several CPUs:
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff812c34f8>] __const_udelay+0x28/0x30
[<ffffffffa033ab9a>] xfs_icsb_lock_cntr+0x2a/0x40 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa033c871>] xfs_icsb_modify_counters+0x71/0x280 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa03413e1>] xfs_trans_reserve+0x171/0x210 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa0378cfd>] xfs_create+0x24d/0x6f0 [xfs]
[<ffffffff8124c8eb>] ? avc_has_perm_flags+0xfb/0x1e0
[<ffffffffa0336eeb>] xfs_vn_mknod+0xbb/0x1e0 [xfs]
[<ffffffffa0337043>] xfs_vn_create+0x13/0x20 [xfs]
[<ffffffff811b0edd>] vfs_create+0xcd/0x130
[<ffffffff811b21ef>] do_last+0xb8f/0x1240
[<ffffffff811b39b2>] path_openat+0xc2/0x490
Looking at the code I see it was stuck at:
STATIC void
xfs_icsb_lock_cntr(
xfs_icsb_cnts_t *icsbp)
{
while (test_and_set_bit(XFS_ICSB_FLAG_LOCK, &icsbp->icsb_flags)) {
ndelay(1000);
}
}
In xfs_icsb_modify_counters() the code is fine. There's a
preempt_disable() called when taking this bit spinlock and a
preempt_enable() after it is released. The issue is that not all
locations are protected by preempt_disable() when PREEMPT_RT is set.
Namely the places that grab all CPU cntr locks.
STATIC void
xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters(
xfs_mount_t *mp)
{
xfs_icsb_cnts_t *cntp;
int i;
for_each_online_cpu(i) {
cntp = (xfs_icsb_cnts_t *)per_cpu_ptr(mp->m_sb_cnts, i);
xfs_icsb_lock_cntr(cntp);
}
}
STATIC void
xfs_icsb_disable_counter()
{
[...]
xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters(mp);
[...]
xfs_icsb_unlock_all_counters(mp);
}
STATIC void
xfs_icsb_balance_counter_locked()
{
[...]
xfs_icsb_disable_counter();
[...]
}
STATIC void
xfs_icsb_balance_counter(
xfs_mount_t *mp,
xfs_sb_field_t fields,
int min_per_cpu)
{
spin_lock(&mp->m_sb_lock);
xfs_icsb_balance_counter_locked(mp, fields, min_per_cpu);
spin_unlock(&mp->m_sb_lock);
}
Now, when PREEMPT_RT is not enabled, that spin_lock() disables
preemption. But for PREEMPT_RT, it does not. Although with my test box I
was not able to produce a task state of all tasks, but I'm assuming that
some task called the xfs_icsb_lock_all_counters() and was preempted by
an RT task and could not finish, causing all callers of that lock to
block indefinitely.
Dave Chinner has stated that the scalability of that code will probably
be negated by PREEMPT_RT, and that it is probably best to just disable
the code in question. Also, this code has been rewritten in newer kernels.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150504004844.GA21261@dastard
Cc: stable-rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Suggested-by: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h
index 800f896a6cc4..6f07c0bcbed4 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
/*
* Feature macros (disable/enable)
*/
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && !defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL)
#define HAVE_PERCPU_SB /* per cpu superblock counters are a 2.6 feature */
#else
#undef HAVE_PERCPU_SB /* per cpu superblock counters are a 2.6 feature */
--
2.4.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable-rt" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
