On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 13:21, Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/16/2012 06:11 PM, Greg Swift wrote: >> >> Does no one have a comment on this? >> >> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 13:52, Greg Swift<gregswift@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> So... At least in RHEL5 you can build an RPM where the Source points >>> to a directory instead of an archive file (tar, etc), thus removing >>> the need for the %setup macro. Is this a feature or a "feature" (read >>> bug) ? > > > Sounds like a "feature", certainly. Try building a src.rpm from such a > thing, it'll merrily include the empty source directory as a source (or > patch). > That is what I was thinking but wanted to gather input about it before filing a bug. _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
