Re: Primitive use of rpm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




You really should share the error you're getting, and possibly your spec file too.
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Rick Hedin <cubsno1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello all. 
 
One group at my organization likes rpm, and one prefers a bunch of files and a shell script.  I haven't been able to change their mind, so I am making an rpm that puts almost of the functionality in a shell script.  That way the rpm-liking group can run the rpm, and get the nice tracking benefits, and the rpm-disliking group can use rpm2cpio, extract the files, and proceed in their preferred fashion.
 
I am having trouble getting my rpmbuild to work, though.  All I have in my spec file is a pre-amble that contains name, version, and release, plus several Sourcex definitions and a BuildRoot definition, and an install section that contains the name of the install shell script.  This should be a very straightforward spec file, that people have done before.  What am I missing?

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list


_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux