On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 14:49 -0400, Fulko Hew wrote: > If so... why use chcon versus the semanage/restorecon technique? > or if my assesement is wrong... can someone point me to a better > explanation/tutorial? chcon is almost never the right way to go. It changes the file on the FS, but it is likely to get changed back the next time a file is installed in that location. semanage fcontext -a will tell the userspace policy what the right label for the file should be. restorecon then queries the 'right' label from the policy and does the same underlying thing chcon does to set that label. So semanage+restorecon == will last, chcon == will likely get blown away and make you angry later. -Eric _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
