On Fri, 19 Aug 2011, Ben Cotton wrote:
To: General discussion about the RPM package manager <rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> From: Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Question about LGPL license for RPM package. I am neither a lawyer nor a RPM developer, so keep that in mind as you read my answer. My understanding is that you want to distribute an RPM package of proprietary software, that is legally acceptable. For example, Skype distributes RPMs of their software and it is most assuredly proprietary. The issue of RPM's license only comes into play if you are distributing RPM itself or any changes to RPM. I hope this helps!
Sounds abour right to me as well! Kind Regards, Keith Roberts ----------------------------------------------------------------- Websites: http://www.karsites.net http://www.php-debuggers.net http://www.raised-from-the-dead.org.uk All email addresses are challenge-response protected with TMDA [http://tmda.net] ----------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
