Re: SUG: Automatic RPM database verification and repair

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday, 03 December 2006, at 15:49:21 (-0500),
Tony Nelson wrote:

> >Whatever I'm doing, you and FC users are highly unlikely to gain any
> >benefit whatsoever.
> 
> That seems strange.  In any event, you have been somewhat helpful to
> me and you are clearly doing work to make RPM more robust in the
> face of both happenstance and stupidity, and I thank you.

The point is that the Fedora Deities have a political beef with Jeff
and thus are unwilling to follow his tree or adopt the new rpm
4.4.7/4.4.8 features.  So anything Jeff does is largely worthless for
you Fedora users.

Michael

-- 
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX)  http://www.kainx.org/  <mej@xxxxxxxxx>
n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/       Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 "Your best?  Losers always whine about [doing] their best.  Winners
  go home and f*** the prom queen."        -- Sean Connery, "The Rock"

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux