Re: How to handle erasing an RPM that contains a mandatory file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 01:44:18PM -0400, Fulko.Hew@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> > rpm -U --oldpackage rpm
> >
> > or, if you must, --force.
> 
> According to the man page, --force is the same as --oldpackage
> (I hope it really is).  [...]

AFAIK it is *not*.

> [...] Then my next concern would be that --force
> (which I could then hopefully use generically in both the new and old
> directions) would hopefully not also turn off any of the error checking
> such as dependencies and results of the pre, post, preun, and postun
> blocks.

That's the reason why you should not use it if anyhow possible, but
use "only" --oldpackage instead.

-- 
--    Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx>
--    X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV   |   Phone: +31 20 6938364
--    Amsterdam, The Netherlands        |     Fax: +31 20 6948204

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux