>And the package manifest is likely including /usr (which is perhaps >unnecessary). speaking of which, do directories installed into now have to be owned by some package? this seems like a recent change, LSB has a somewhat strange testbed where a minimal base LSB conforming system is built, but is not managed by rpm. It is, however, used to test the installation of LSB-conforming packages and since we uplifted to 4.4.6 those packages that /don't/ have package-specific directories in the manifest are getting dependency failures on those directories. We can easily solve this if that's the case, of course. _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
