Ok, I filed 201849 as well. Maybe they'll even get a pay rise. JP Jeff Johnson wrote: > > On Aug 9, 2006, at 9:29 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: > >> John Pye wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've got a package which I'm trying to build using RPM. It uses all the >>> standard GNU autotools so I thought I'd try using %configure macro. I >>> discovered that this macro includes some lines that, amongst other >>> things, sets: >>> >>> FFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -m32 >>> -march=i386 -mtune=pentium4 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables' >>> >>> This then gives an error later in the ./configure execution, including >>> that g77 says that "-mtune=pentium4" is an invalid option. >> >> >>> This is with RPM 4.4.1 on FC4 and RPM 4.4.2 on FC5. >> >> >> This is a fedora-specific issue (in particular, redhat-rpm-config), and >> should be reported there: >> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ >> against Fedora Core/redhat-rpm-config >> > > But make sure that you report against all relevant "Fedora Core" > versions, > at least "fc4" and "fc5" and "fc6", to insure that bug gets properly > fixed. > > Hint: Harried, overworked, developer salary increases are often based > on the bogus metric > of no. of bugzilla bugs fixed. Really ... > > 73 de Jeff > > _______________________________________________ > Rpm-list mailing list > Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list > _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
