yes, I understand that it is not an error to not have a sig, but how can
--checksig report that the sha1 and md5 signatures are OK?
but that said, how can I tell if a rpm has been signed or not?
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 09:32:38PM -0400, Jason Pyeron wrote:
why is -K saying the signature is OK, when it is not signed.
[root@testserver rpms.pdinc.us]# rpm -K
/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/mod_dav_svn-1.1.1-2.1.i386.rpm
/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/mod_dav_svn-1.1.1-2.1.i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Excitingly, missing signatures aren't errors.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Partner & Sr. Manager 7 West 24th Street #100 -
- +1 (443) 921-0381 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 -
- -
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you
have received it in error, purge the message from your system and
notify the sender immediately. Any other use of the email by you
is prohibited.
_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
