On August 31, 2005 11:41:50 PM -0400 Dan Franklin <dfranklin@xxxxxxx> wrote:
At 04:02 PM 8/31/2005, Frank Cusack wrote:
So it seems perl.req should look for 'use' AND calls to explicitly named
package methods, and perl.prov should look at filenames AND explicit
package statements.
Yes, it could do that. rpmbuild doesn't currently go down to that level for C++ code. There is
some danger of generating an excessive list of requirements, since just because a call to an
explicitly named package occurs in the file doesn't mean it will ever occur in practice.
Not sure what you mean about C++. C++ code generates ELF binaries
and all required shared libraries are listed as dependencies. So
shared libraries' provides are complete, and requires are complete
wrt link information recorded in the binary (which may be incorrect
or excessive, but unlike Perl will fail to run at all if a library whose
code isn't actually called is linked against).
-frank
_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
