Yes, spot on correct. Dumb user error, appreciate your feedback. ,Adam On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 14:54, Bob Kashani wrote: > On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 11:57 -0500, Adam Welch wrote: > > I am seeing what I believe is a repeatable problem with the behavior of > > -Uvh --force --nodeps. > > > > Here's the environment. > > > > rpm-4.2.1-4.4 > > rpmdb-redhat-3-0.20031007 > > Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS release 3 (Taroon Update 1) > > 2.4.21-9.0.1.ELsmp > > behavior has been found repeatable on different hosts > > > > Here's the behavior. > > > > 1. /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf is owned by httpd-2.0.46-32.ent > > 2. someone has edited httpd.conf - it no longer matches the installed > > version (I am thinking this may be a key issue) > > 3. my company replaces this file with one of our own via mycompany.rpm > > 4. we use --force --nodeps with mycompany.rpm > > 5. we expect our file to replace httpd.conf - we think rpm's manpage > > assures us that our usage should accomplish this > > 6. -Uvh --force --nodeps runs smoothly and exits with a 0 > > 7. httpd.conf is *NOT* replaced by the mycompany.rpm version of the > > file > > 8. if we rm -f httpd.conf and retry, it works - httpd.conf now matches > > the version from mycompany.rpm > > > > I believe that this is a bug. I couldn't find a dup of it in RH's > > bugzilla. Can someone confirm that this is a bug and/or suggest a > > fix/workaround? > > This is actually normal behavior. A -U will never replace an existing > config file. > > You could do as, Valery, has already suggested and use a %pre scriptlet > in your spec file to move/remove the old config file before the install > of the new one. > > Bob _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
