Re: Strange behaviour with rpm -qf and %{epoch}

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jos Vos wrote :

> On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 10:40:01PM +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:
> 
> > >   rpm -q --qf '[%{name} %{version} %{release} %{epoch} %{arch}
> > %{filenames}\n]'
> 
> > Hmmm, I guess I'm king of curious on this one too. Looks like it
doesn't
> > work when the epoch _is_ set (as it is in the samba package).
> 
> Yep... note that it *does* work when moving the '[' *after* the %{epoch}
> and then the epoch seems to be printed correctly.

... note also that moving %{epoch} after %{filenames} produces a different
error.

See, epoch is evil, period :-D

Matthias

-- 
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) - Linux kernel 2.6.9-1.724_FC3.radeon
Load : 0.22 0.25 0.16

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux