Re: duplicate RPMs on an AMD64 box (was: Multiple arch rpm install in EM64T)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

I have try to install a x86_64 and i386 package on my EM64T machine. But
the behaviour you mention did not happened. ie. the 32bit binary file
from i386 package replaced the installed 64bit binary file -_-. The
package is packed by me and the path of the binary is not
in /bin, /usr/bin or something like that, but in
"/usr/software_name/bin". Is that matters? Or I should specify something
in the spec file?

Best regards,
John Lau

2005-01-03 20:04 -0500ïrpm-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx:
> Well, except for elf binaries. if they are binaries and two files
> would
> conflict and they are 32bit and 64bit package binaries they're checked
> to see which one is the compat type for that architecture and that
> type
> is kept for both packages.
> 
> install only glibc.x86_64 on an opteron some time.
> 
> then run: 
>  file /sbin/ldconfig
> /sbin/ldconfig: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64, version 1
> (SYSV),
> for GNU/Linux 2.4.0, statically linked, stripped
> 
> then yum install glibc.i686
> 
> and run the same command.
> 
> ldconfig will not be replaced.
> 
> -sv
-- 
John Lau Chi Fai
cflau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Software Engineer
Center for Large-Scale Computation

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux