On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 05:14:03PM -0500, Vadim Nasardinov wrote: > I'm a little confused by this whole duplicate RPM business as well. I > recently installed FC3 on a new AMD64 machine. I noticed that some > RPMs were installed in duplicate. For example, > > ... > > That's a little confusing. This breaks my mental model of how RPM is > supposed to work. In what sense? Files/directories can be owned by multiple packages *if* they are exactly the same (otherwise the packages would conflict). This happened in the past for example with several XFree86-* packages. -- -- Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> -- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364 -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204 _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
