On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 06:33:00PM -0500, Michael Jennings wrote: > On Friday, 05 November 2004, at 18:14:11 (-0500), > Jeff Johnson wrote: > > > Requires: rpmlib(ConcurrentAccess) = 4.1-1 > > Wouldn't that be >= 4.1-1? Technically no, but it really doesn't matter much. The range ">=" is equivalent to promising "forever", and no one, certainly not me, can make that promise. FWIW, the comparison matches Provides: rpmlib(ConcurrentAccess) <= 4.1-1 another closed range that makes no promise of "forever", that perhaps permits retrofitting alternative incompatible implementations in earlier versions of rpm, but let's not go there *really*. 73 de Jeff -- Jeff Johnson ARS N3NPQ jbj@xxxxxxxxxx (jbj@xxxxxxx) Chapel Hill, NC _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
