Re: query regarding CAN-2001-0923

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 11:48:05AM -0400, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> 
> The CAN report should say rpm-4.0 and rpm-4.0.2 only, there was no
> rpm-4.0.1 release.
> 

Correction, rpm-4.0.2 "development", I do not believe the final rpm-4.0.2
release was affected.

I can/will check if it really really matters.

Or see rpm cvs at :pserver:anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxx:/cvs/devel, dates
and more are all there, and answer your own questions.

73 de Jeff

-- 
Jeff Johnson	ARS N3NPQ
jbj@xxxxxxxxxx (jbj@xxxxxxx)
Chapel Hill, NC

_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux