Re: Epochs in filenames

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 15:50, Mariusz Mazur wrote:
> On Åroda 11 sierpieÅ 2004 01:53, James Olin Oden wrote:
> > Because, typically, epoch is used to deal with radical changes to versions
> > such that there would be no sane way to determine generically from the
> > version that this package should upgrade another package.  That said, if
> > you used a different epoch per distro then you would have to have a
> > different epoch per distro per major version format change.  Other than
> > that using to deliniate the distro would not give you what you wanted.
> > Say RedHat had epoch 0, Fedora had epoch 1 and Suse epoch 2, then that
> > would mean that a RedHat package would always win, but if you were on a
> > Fedora or Suse system that is probably not what you want.
> 
> I didn't know that inter-distro compatibility is an issue. Could someone that 
> uses packages from various distributions tell me if it gives any major 
> headaches?

I never have these issues, but I apparently some people already get
headaches when I say so here ;-)


_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux