RE: distro name

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks; that would explain why I could not find it.
-Aaron 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rpm-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:rpm-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wichmann, Mats D
> Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 12:56 PM
> To: RPM Package Manager
> Subject: RE: distro name
> 
> 
> >	A search of the lsb core document, v1.3 and the v2.0 
> candidate, do not 
> >mention such a file. Rodrigo, were you referring to an existing 
> >standard, or just proposing one?
> 
> >> You mean, like /etc/lsb-release ?
> 
> The standard actually calls out the lsb_release command, and 
> does not require the /etc/lsb-release file to be part of the 
> implementation of that command.  Our example implementation 
> of an lsb_release does so, however, and it looks like most 
> distros are based off the example.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rpm-list mailing list
> Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
> 


_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux