Bryan Stillwell wrote: > Wichmann, Mats D wrote: > > Conceptually, you should depend on something that both > > packages provide (virtual package), but that doesn't > > help much if there isn't a common provide you can depend > > on. I presume there isn't? > > Actually it looks like xorg-x11-devel does provide XFree86-devel, so I > guess that'll work. It still would be nice to know how an OR might be > done. I tried taking a look at parseReqs.c, but nothing popped out at > me... That has been a long time limitation of rpm. To the best of my knowledge the only way to handle this case is with virtual packages provided by the alternatives. Bob _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
