On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 11:32, Sandra Carney wrote: > If that comes up empty that might be one explanation. You get around > it by creating a virtual( 'fake' ) package which says it provides your > libraries. Look it up in 'Red Hat RPM Guide' pp. 412-416. Actually, I would just like it if the actual package could say that it provides those libraries; how can I get it to do that? Thanks, Tom _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
