Re: Alternative approach-RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In regard to: Re: Alternative approach-RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX, Christian Goetze...:

>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are using Red Hat Linux 8. Our application RPM  is a relocatable
>> package. In the application spec file, we use RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX in
>> postinstall. With rpm 4.1, this environmental variable is not being set.
>> Hence cannot use this variable.
>>
>> Is there any other way, we can achieve the same result as
>> RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX ? We tried to upgrade to rpm 4.2 but in vain.
>
>Did you get any answer on this? I am having the same problem.

RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX was just discussed on the mailing list last week, check
the archives.  Assuming your spec only specifies one Prefix:, you
probably want something like

if test X"$RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX0" = X"" ; then
	RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX0=%{prefix}
fi

at the top of your %post, and then you want to use RPM_INSTALL_PREFIX0
in your %post.

Check the archives for more details.

>Rpm-list mailing list
>Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

Tim
-- 
Tim Mooney                              mooney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Information Technology Services         (701) 231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building              (701) 231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164


_______________________________________________
Rpm-list mailing list
Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

[Index of Archives]     [RPM Ecosystem]     [Linux Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [IETF Discussion]

  Powered by Linux