On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Jeff Johnson wrote: > Artem B. Bityuckiy wrote: > > > Artem B. Bityuckiy wrote: > > > >> when I do rpm -qa it writes me warnings like this: > >> > >> warning: package glibc = 2.3.2-101 was already added, replacing with > >> glibc <= 2 > >> .3.2-101 > >> > >> This happens for several RPMs. > >> > >> Please, say what this means. > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > > I've updated RH9 -> FC1 and have a number of troubles: cvs doesn't > > work, for example. I suppose that there is some relationship with > > these warnings... > > > > You've specified glibc multiple times on the command line, probably > because there are both i386 and i686 > packages and you are using a wild card. There are important differences > between i386 and i686 glibc, only > the i686 package has NPTL. > Hey Jeff, I get this exact same warning when using rpm with my autorollback patch. I think your explanation explains why. What might I do to get the message to go away? Just as a brief re-cap of what the patch does, it builds a rollback transaction as it is running a transaction. Each time something sucessfully installs/erases that package (or header) gets added to the rollback transaction. If I have no failures I discard the rollback transaction, if something fails I run it. Anyway, so I have two transactions instatiated at the same time in librpm, and I suspect from what you said this is where the funny little warnings are coming from. So again, what might I do (or what code might I read (-;) to aleviate these little warning messages? Thanks...james > I can't think of a correlation between glibc and cvs. Well, most > everything depends on glibc somehow ... > > Error message smells like rpm-4.0.4, I fergit ... > > 73 de Jeff > > > _______________________________________________ > Rpm-list mailing list > Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list > _______________________________________________ Rpm-list mailing list Rpm-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
