On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 20:59, joe wrote: > Craig Toenes wrote: > > >I currently have RH 9 and I am not hip enough for > >Fedora. > >I saw that RH recently came out with a "Professional > >Workstation" that has updates and is renewable. My > >question is.. Do you think this is a good option for > >those of us who are not savy enough for developement? > >If I can do an upgrade as opposed to a fresh install, > >this would be perfect for someone like me that wants > >to > >use RH on a personal scale. What do you guys think? > > > > > If you are prettty happy with RH 9, and don't want to get down with > fedora, the Pro Workstation idea makes sense - the management features > make it a good choice for the workspace, but no reason it can't be used > at home too. > > BTW I like fedora, in most ways it feels just like RH 9.1 - IOW it's > like a faster, less buggy version of RH9. --- I think that the upgrade paths are likely to go smoother with their EL products than with Fedora. Though Fedora upgrade (from RH 9) went reasonably well for me, I did ultimately need to nuke ~/.openoffice to get it to work. Fedora will ultimately offer more exiting and more edgier updates than RHEL/WS. I find RH AS 3 to be very fast and very stable but if your desire is to run the latest version of KDE for example, Fedora would be a better route. Craig -- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
